Gemini 2.5 Pro Aces Humanity’s Last Exam With Powerful AI Performance

Introduction

Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) is a benchmark designed to test deep reasoning and problem-solving capabilities of large language models (LLMs). It is a rigorous testing regime that pushes ultimate limits of these models so that these models are tested beyond ordinary tasks of mere language generation and memorization. It follows a strict protocol.

LLMs are tested for intricate questions from different fields which can only be solved by a specialist of that particular discipline. These tests are prepared by specialists of each field from sciences and humanities. At a cursory glance, Gemini 2.5 Pro’s 18.8% score on Humanity’s Exam may not be noticeable but it indicates models’ ability to solve high-difficulty questions and signifies its skills to tackle sophisticated tasks. In summary, Humanity’s Last Exam Gemini 2.5 Pro shows it’s superior problem solving skills.

Humanity’s Last Exam Test parameters

Questions are meticulously selected by the experts. Though the final questions are not publicly available but their outlines can be described. The test includes questions designed to test deep reasoning of the LLMs and not just simple incoherent text. Models are subjected to advanced mathematics, physics, natural sciences, social sciences all prepared by the subject specialists and experts. Then real-world simulations are created to test models in real world scenarios. After that large language models are put through a set of highly advanced prompts which tests their methodical approach towards problem solving.

Setting the Stage for the Next Generation of LLMs

Steady progress has been observed in the field of LLMs in the recent years, especially in the areas of cognitive tasks which essentially require human thinking and comprehension. It’s a marvelous feat achieved in the field of Large Language Models. With these advancements in artificial intelligence, it is essential to assess and compare these advanced systems in an objective manner. Therefore, benchmarking has become a standard procedure for practically testing all these models and assess their strengths and weaknesses. Each model is subjected to thorough scrutiny during testing and different parameters are compared with other models. LLMs are tested for their abilities in reasoning, coding, language comprehension and understanding of scientific knowledge. Researchers and practitioners get insightful data from these tests for practical applications.

Key Specifications of Gemini 2.5 Pro

  • Release Date: March 25, 2025 (Experimental)
  • Context Window: 1 million tokens
  • Multimodality Support: Text, Image, Audio, Video (Input); Text (Output)
  • Reasoning Capabilities: Enhanced, “Thinking Model,” Step-by-step reasoning
  • Coding Capabilities: Code generation, transformation, editing
  • Integration: Google AI Studio, Gemini Advanced, Vertex AI
  • Tool Use: Grounding with Google Search, Code execution, Function calling

A Deep Dive into Capabilities and Features

Humanity's Last Exam Gemini 2.5 Pro
Humanity’s Last Exam: Gemini 2.5 Pro

Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro represents a significant leap forward in the Gemini series of models, marking improved reasoning and handling complex coding tasks. This model is referred to as “thinking mode” based on a system which solves problems in a measured and step by step manner increasing accuracy.  This methodical reasoning gives it the edge to tackle complex comprehension tasks. These capabilities give developers the tool needed for generating, transforming and editing code which was not possible before. That’s why “Vibe Coding” is trending these days. Even people with no knowledge of coding are building complex web and autonomous applications.

With a context window of one million tokens, its capable of producing extensive data sets. It can also produce long documents without fragmenting data. Its integration with Google’s Cloud Vertex AI and support for external tools enables it to generate live research with its Live API. Thus, making Gemini 2.5 pro becomes a robust, scalable solution for real time tasks. Additionally, its Deep Research feature offers sophisticated research support.

Humanity’s Last Exam Gemini 2.5 Pro’s Benchmark Results

Benchmark Scores Graph

Benchmark Scores for Gemini 2.5 Pro


The performance of Gemini 2.5 pro and other LLMs is measured in a series of LLM benchmarks consisting of reasoning, mathematics, coding, extended context understanding and multimodality. Gemini 2.5 pro scored 18.8% on Humanity’s Last Exam beating all the leading LLM models. It scored 84.0% on GPQA Diamond benchmark. In coding ability it scored 74.4% on LiveCodeBench V5, 74.0% on Aider Polyglot and 63.8% on the SWE-bench (verified bench mark for agentic coding). With a score of 91.5% on the MRCR benchmark it showed remarkable coherence in handling long text.

Capabilities and Features of Key Competitors


To get the whole picture, Gemini 2.5 pro’s capabilities are measured alongside other prominent language models. These include OpenAI’s GPT-4 series (GPT-4.5, GPT 4o) which boast multimodal functionality with a context window as large as 128k tokens. And Anthropic’s Claude 3 family (Opus and Sonnet models), with a context window of 200k tokens, leading the way in stress reasoning, coding and multilingual communication.

Capabilities and Features of Leading LLMs

For a comprehensive evaluation, let’s take a closer look at the capabilities of these leading large language models. Closely observe the following graph and you will become familiar with advancements of LLMs in a quick overview.

LLM Features Comparison

LLM Features Comparison

Feature Gemini 2.5 Pro GPT-4 (and variants) Claude 3
(Opus/Sonnet)
Grok 3 DeepSeek R1
Reasoning Enhanced, Thinking Model Advanced Strong Emphasis, Think Mode Emphasis, RL-trained
Coding Advanced Strong Strong Strong Strong
Language Understanding Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong
Multimodality Native (Text, Image, Audio, Video Input) Yes (Text, Image, Audio) Yes (Text, Image Input) Yes (Text, Image Input) Yes (Text, Image Input)
Context Window 1M (to 2M) Up to 128K (GPT-4o) 200K 128K 128K
Tool Use Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
“Thinking” Modes Yes No Yes (Extended Thinking) Yes (Think Mode) No
Real-time Data Access Yes (via Search Grounding & Live API) Yes (via Plugins/Bing) No Yes (via DeepSearch) No

What These Benchmark Comparisons Might Suggest

Humanity’s Last Exam Gemini 2.5 Pro has already proven this in rigorous testing. From these benchmarks comparison we can safely say that Gemini 2.5 pro is both capable and competitive. Particularly it stands out in the realms of complex reasoning and extended context processing. This implies that best suited model depends upon your application’s specific needs. Other than comparing scores, factors like speed and cost are equally important. In some scenarios these factors take the center stage while deciding which model to choose. These observations definitely tell us the progress these models have made in multimodality, context retention and systematic reasoning. It bodes well for a future in which Artificial Intelligence systems will be able to solve complex real-world problems for the humanity.

Limitations of Benchmarks


Benchmarks are useful framework for comparing LLMs but these are inherently flawed in capturing full scope of AI system’s practical applications. The focus of these test is very narrow while humanity is still gasping to catch up with amazing progress made by LLMs and their practical uses. As these models approach to near-perfect scores, it becomes harder through these tests to differentiate. There arises the need for more challenging and diverse evaluations. This numerical data must be complemented with human creativity, ethical judgement and common sense. It can only be achieved with thorough testing by humans in practical situations.

LLMs Advancements and Implications

We have achieved phenomenal progress in LLMs and Gemini 2.5 is an example of this rapid progress. It will give us cutting edge artificial intelligence tools to solve complex problems. Following are the areas in which we can take advantage of these new technologies.


Climate Change:

It’s a well-known fact that climatic models involve huge datasets. With new AI tools we may be able to recognize patterns with more precision resulting in better climatic solutions.


Health and Medicine:

Genome sequencing is already witnessing marvelous breakthroughs. Now focus is being shifted to more personalized treatments.

Workplace Transformation:

During Covid pandemic, “Work from Home” theme prevailed and we kept our social structure together. New productivity tools are effective in achieving innovative work environments.

Conclusion:

The exam is all about deep reasoning and reaching methodical solutions. Gemini 2.5 Pro’s 18.8% score on this benchmark is a remarkable breakthrough, making it a leader in the field of artificial intelligence. It sets a stage for future innovations. Other large language models are trying to catch up. Language models benchmark results show Gemini 2.5 Pro is a highly advanced model. It stands out amongst the LLMs and has become a formidable competitor in the arena of AI development in a very short period of time. Its main characteristics are enhanced reasoning, robust mathematical abilities and expansive context window which makes it a versatile tool for demanding applications.

Tell me about Humanity’s Last Exam and Gemini 2.5 Pro’s performance?

Humanity’s Last Exam is created to test and measure deep reasoning. It also checks ability of LLMs to integrate knowledge from diverse fields. It shows the model can handle expert level questions.

Why HLE is considered a challenging benchmark?

It consists of meticulously chosen expert level questions from the fields of mathematics, science and humanities. Threshold is deliberately set high. It pushes LLMs to generate intelligent answers rather than mere superficial text.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro with other Large Models on HLE?

GPT4 variant and Claude 3 normally score in the ranges from 6 to 9%, which is very low as compared with Gemini 2.5 Pro’s score of 18.8%. This is a landmark achievement for this model. Though other models started early and have diverse set of tools like web searching etc., but Gemini 2.5 Pro caught up with these models relatively fast and beat them.

What are the key takeaways of Humanity’s Last Exam scores?

Achieving high scores on Humanity’s tells superior reasoning capability to synthesize knowledge across various fields. The score indicates its ability to answer multi domain questions. But as is true about all other benchmarks it still needs improvements. The limitations of LLMs are exposed only in practical real-world applications.

What topics are covered in Humanity’s Last Exam?

a) Deep reasoning
b) Advanced mathematics
c) Physics and natural sciences
d) Humanities and social sciences
e) Real world problem simulations
f) prompts involving step by step thinking

Leave a Comment